1. Which project did you review? The project that I reviewed was, The Art of War in the Western World, by Jason Hugar.
2. Why did you select the Exhibit you critiqued? The true reason why I chose this piece had to do with the title of the exhibit. I was very intrigued by what The Art of War looked like.
3. What challenges did you face in writing the critique article and how did you overcome them? The challenges that I faced when analyzing the exhibit was trying to keep an open mind of art from war time events. I was able to overcome this quite early in the exhibit when I saw the portrait of Augustus towering over six feet in the air. It was at this point that I realized the exhibit wasn’t going to be about only blood and gore.
4. How do you feel about critiquing your peers work? I think it is always difficult to critique your peers because you don’t want to come across as being harsh or insensitive. All of us understand how much time we put into our projects, so to have some said something bad about it can hurt. In any case, I feel I was fare with my criticisms and truly enjoyed the exhibit.
5. Would you like to read the critique your peers wrote about your Art Curation Project? After thinking about this, I decided that I would not want to know what my peers wrote about my project. I think an exhibit is like a work of art. You need to design it the way that you believe it should look and not worry about pleasing everyone.
6. On a scale of 1-10 I would give this exhibit a 9.
7. I found this project to be very challenging, but a great learning experience in the end.
No comments:
Post a Comment